No hiding behind the veil: Directors are now personally liable for unpaid EPF contributions

PrintMailRate-it
The Federal Court in Mohd Abdul Karim Abdullah & Ors v Lembaga Kumpulan Wang Simpanan Pekerja [2025] has sent a clear message: company directors can no longer shield themselves behind the corporate veil when it comes to Employees Provident Fund (EPF) obligations.
      

Key takeaways every director should know

  • Personal Liability: Under Section 46 of the EPF Act 1991, directors are personally and directly liable for unpaid EPF contributions—even if the company itself is not sued.
  • No “Sleeping Directors”: All directors, regardless of their involvement in daily operations, share equal responsibility for compliance.
  • Bypassing Liquidation: The EPF Board can pursue directors directly, without waiting in line with other creditors during liquidation.
  • High stakes for new directors, taking on a directorship without due diligence could expose you to liabilities. Safeguarding employees’ retirement savings is not just a corporate duty, it’s a personal one.
       

Implications

Directorship now carries immediate personal risk. Directors must ensure robust internal controls for EPF compliance and carefully assess any company before stepping into a leadership role. It is imperative to take proactive steps to prevent non-compliance.​​​​​​​​

From The Newsletter

Contact

Contact Person Picture

Geetha Salva

+603 2276 5580

Send inquiry

How We Can Help

Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Deutschland Weltweit Search Menu